CVE-2026-53723
MediumCVSS 5.8Exploitation Probability (EPSS)
Low risk12th percentile - higher than 12% of all known CVEs
Summary
Guzzle Services prior to version 1.5.4 has an issue with safely serializing XML element values containing the CDATA terminator `]]>`. An attacker can introduce malicious data, leading to premature closing of the CDATA section and interpretation of the remaining part as XML markup.
Risk Assessment
Organizations may be exposed to data manipulation in outgoing requests, potentially leading to unauthorized access or incorrect application behavior. The potential risk includes injecting malicious XML elements, which can alter operation semantics.
Recommendation
It is recommended to upgrade to version 1.5.3 or later to fix the issue. Alternatively, constrain attacker-controlled XML element values with strict filters or avoid serializing untrusted data into XML element text.
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-124560Critical
A vulnerability was found in D-Link DIR-878 version 1.20B05 in the GetCAPTCHAsetting function of bin/prog.cgi (HNAP Handler component). Manipulating the uid argument results in a heap-based buffer overflow. The attack can be initiated remotely and the exploit has been made public.
- CVE-2026-119506Critical
The Frontend Admin by DynamiApps plugin (acf-frontend-form-element) through version 3.30.1 contains an incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability. The flaw allows an attacker to escalate privileges within the WordPress site.
- CVE-2026-6715Critical
IBM Concert 1.0 through 3.0.1.1 allows an attacker to supply crafted input that is incorporated into an operating system command without adequate validation or sanitization. Successful exploitation allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with the privileges of the affected service.
- CVE-2026-17466Critical
IBM Optim versions 1.0.0, 1.1.0, and 1.2.0 are vulnerable to path traversal, allowing a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information.
- CVE-2026-15266Critical
IBM Concert 1.0 through 3.0.1.1 contains components that allow potentially unsafe command execution, which could be exploited to run arbitrary system commands on the host.
- CVE-2026-114464Critical
IBM Process Mining 2.0.0 through 2.2.1 has improper access control, which could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information.
- CVE-2026-107331Critical
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 has an absolute-path traversal vulnerability that could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information.
- CVE-2026-109900Critical
The Melapress Role Editor plugin for WordPress (through version 1.3.0) contains an incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability that allows privilege escalation. A low-privileged user can gain a higher level of access within the system.
- CVE-2026-101117Critical
IBM WebSphere Extreme Scale versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.2.2 have an improper Content Security Policy configuration that could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions. The flaw concerns browser-side protection mechanisms.
- CVE-2026-124494Critical
SunEditor before 3.4.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability because the html.clean() sanitizer's _normalizeURL() function decodes named entities like : to an empty string. Attackers can inject href values such as javascript: that pass the _isSafeURL() check but are decoded by browsers, executing JavaScript when victims click stored links.
Original NVD description (English source)
Guzzle Services provides an implementation of the Guzzle Command library that uses Guzzle service descriptions to describe web services, serialize requests, and parse responses into easy to use model structures. Versions prior ro 1.5.4 do not safely serialize scalar XML element values containing the CDATA terminator `]]>`. The XML request serializer writes values containing `<`, `>`, or `&` with `XMLWriter::writeCData($value)`. If attacker-controlled input contains `]]>`, the CDATA section closes early and the remainder is interpreted as XML markup. This is an outgoing request-body integrity issue, not a response parsing issue. The attacker does not need to control the service description or schema. Users are affected when all of the following are true: the application uses `guzzlehttp/guzzle-services` to serialize outgoing requests; a request parameter or `additionalParameters` schema uses `location: xml`; the value is serialized as XML element text, not an XML attribute; the value can contain attacker-controlled, user-controlled, tenant-controlled, or otherwise untrusted input; the value is not constrained by a safe `enum`, `pattern`, or custom filter that excludes `]]>`; and the downstream service parses the generated XML structurally and may act on unexpected, duplicated, or injected elements. Applications that serialize untrusted input into `location: xml` request parameters can emit XML containing attacker-controlled elements outside the intended text node. Depending on the receiving service, this can alter operation semantics, smuggle privileged fields, bypass modeled parameter boundaries, or create conflicting duplicated elements. Fixed service descriptions are sufficient if they contain an XML element parameter populated from attacker-controlled input. Users are not directly affected if they only use Guzzle Services to deserialize HTTP response bodies. Response XML parsing uses the response XML location visitor and does not invoke the vulnerable request XML serializer. Response bodies matter only in a second-order flow, such as parsing attacker-controlled response XML, storing or forwarding a parsed string value, and later using it as a `location: xml` request parameter. The issue is patched in `1.5.3` and later by safely splitting embedded CDATA terminators before serialization. The fix preserves the original scalar value as XML text and prevents injected nodes. As a workaround, constrain attacker-controlled XML element values with a strict `enum`, `pattern`, or custom filter that excludes `]]>`, or avoid serializing untrusted data into `location: xml` element text until patched. Where appropriate for the service schema, XML attributes are not affected because they are written with XMLWriter attribute APIs rather than CDATA sections. To determine whether action is needed, search service descriptions for request parameters using `location: xml`, including operation `parameters` and `additionalParameters`. Response-only `models` are not directly affected unless parsed values are reused for request serialization. For object and array parameters, review nested scalar properties because leaf element values can still be affected.
Vulnerability data from NVD (NIST) · CISA KEV · EPSS

