CVE-2026-14440
MediumCVSS 6.8Exploitation Probability (EPSS)
Low risk10th percentile - higher than 10% of all known CVEs
Summary
A vulnerability in Cloudflare Universal SSL allows bypassing strict CAA records with accounturi or validationmethods parameters (RFC 8657) during TLS certificate issuance. The auto-managed CAA RRset overrides customer configuration, potentially enabling an attacker to obtain a trusted certificate for the victim's domain.
Risk Assessment
The risk involves a potential MITM (man-in-the-middle) attack on a Cloudflare customer's domain if an attacker can obtain a TLS certificate from a trusted CA. Exploitation requires additional conditions, such as holding an ACME account and bypassing multi-perspective validation.
Recommendation
Disable Universal SSL on zones requiring strict enforcement of CAA records with RFC 8657 parameters. Additionally, implement Certificate Transparency (CT) monitoring to detect unauthorized certificate issuance.
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-124585Critical
A vulnerability was found in Chengdu Feiyuxing Technology VW2100 and VEC10GP devices within the web administration interface. The add_expmac function in var/html/webserver mishandles the mac argument, resulting in OS command injection. The attack can be performed remotely and a public exploit is available.
- CVE-2026-123870Critical
The otterdog webapp evaluates a format-string built from the incoming GitHub webhook JSON body using Python's eval(). When GITHUB_WEBHOOK_SECRET is unset or empty (default None), the HMAC signature check is skipped entirely, allowing an unauthenticated network client to reach the eval() sink with attacker-controlled input and execute arbitrary Python on the host.
- CVE-2026-124580Critical
A vulnerability was found in Chengdu Feiyuxing Technology VW2100 and VEC10GP version 1.0 B-MB3W202-210825-r11775, affecting the handle_wechat_cn_wifi function in var/html/webserver within the Weixin Auth Endpoint component. Manipulation of the extend argument results in OS command injection. The attack can be executed remotely and the exploit has been made public.
- CVE-2026-124577Critical
A weakness has been identified in Intelbras SG 2404 PoE L2+ versions 1.00.70 and 1.00.72, affecting an unknown function in the /EXCU_SHELL file within the Web Management Interface component. Manipulation can lead to improper authentication. The attack can be launched remotely and the exploit has been made publicly available.
- CVE-2026-113364Critical
Buffer overflow in the data receiving process in NEC WebSAM WinShare versions 7.5.0 and earlier, 7.6.0, and 7.7.0 through 7.7.2 on Windows allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges via a crafted packet with a malformed data size value in the protocol header.
- CVE-2026-113363Critical
Improper input validation in the network communication processing in NEC WebSAM WinShare versions 7.2.0 through 7.5.0, 7.6.0, and 7.7.0 through 7.7.2 on Windows allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands with SYSTEM privileges via a crafted network packet sent to the computer running WinShare.
- CVE-2026-124560Critical
A vulnerability was found in D-Link DIR-878 version 1.20B05 in the GetCAPTCHAsetting function of bin/prog.cgi (HNAP Handler component). Manipulating the uid argument results in a heap-based buffer overflow. The attack can be initiated remotely and the exploit has been made public.
- CVE-2026-119506Critical
The Frontend Admin by DynamiApps plugin (acf-frontend-form-element) through version 3.30.1 contains an incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability. The flaw allows an attacker to escalate privileges within the WordPress site.
- CVE-2026-6715Critical
IBM Concert 1.0 through 3.0.1.1 allows an attacker to supply crafted input that is incorporated into an operating system command without adequate validation or sanitization. Successful exploitation allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with the privileges of the affected service.
- CVE-2026-17466Critical
IBM Optim versions 1.0.0, 1.1.0, and 1.2.0 are vulnerable to path traversal, allowing a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information.
Original NVD description (English source)
Description: To issue and renew TLS certificates on behalf of customers, Cloudflare's Universal SSL feature automatically manages the CAA RRset for the customer's zone. This auto-managed RRset is permissive by design (e.g. 'issue "letsencrypt.org"' without parameters). On Universal SSL zones, Cloudflare's authoritative DNS serves this auto-managed RRset at query time, superseding any customer-configured CAA records on the zone. When a customer publishes a stricter CAA record using the RFC 8657 accounturi or validationmethods parameters, the Certificate Authority does not observe those parameters when evaluating the served RRset under RFC 8659. As a result, the RFC 8657 account-binding and validation-method-binding protections are not enforced end-to-end on Universal SSL zones. Successful exploitation could result in issuance of a browser-trusted TLS certificate to an attacker, enabling MITM against the affected domain. Exploitation is non-trivial in practice: an attacker would need to hold an ACME account at one of the Certificate Authorities in the served CAA RRset and to simultaneously satisfy domain control validation across the multiple geographically distinct Network Perspectives the CA relies on for Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration. Cloudflare prefixes are anycast-announced from hundreds of locations globally, raising the bar against single-vantage-point BGP hijacks. Any resulting misissuance of a browser-trusted certificate is subject to Certificate Transparency logging required by major browsers, and would be visible to CT monitoring. Mitigation: Customers requiring strict RFC 8657 enforcement need to disable Universal SSL on the affected zone. Universal SSL's automatic CAA management and customer-set RFC 8657 accounturi and validationmethods enforcement are mutually exclusive by the nature of the issue, so there is no in-product workaround that preserves both. Certificate Transparency monitoring is recommended for all customers as a general detection control. Credits: David Osipov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2713-9242), independent researcher
Vulnerability data from NVD (NIST) · CISA KEV · EPSS

