CVE-2026-116372
HighCVSS 7.7Exploitation Probability (EPSS)
Low risk30th percentile - higher than 30% of all known CVEs
Summary
MISP mispguard is a security filtering proxy that inspects and blocks MISP feed responses based on configured rules. The process_feed_response method in src/mispguard.py was responsible for evaluating feed responses before they reached the MISP instance. The original logic only explicitly handled the case where the HTTP status code was not 200 by passing the response through without filtering, on the assumption that non-200 responses would not carry ingestible event data. However, HTTP 2xx status codes other than 200 (such as 201 Created, 203 Non-Authoritative Information, and 206 Partial Content) were also passed through unfiltered. Because MISP may still ingest content from these responses, a malicious or compromised feed host could return a 203 or 206 status code with arbitrary content, effectively bypassing all of mispguard's filtering rules. This allowed unfiltered or malicious feed data to be ingested into the MISP instance, undermining the security controls that mispguard is designed to enforce. The vulnerability requires the attacker to control or compromise a feed endpoint configured in the MISP instance. No authentication or user interaction is required beyond the feed polling mechanism already in place.
Risk Assessment
An attacker controlling a feed could bypass mispguard filtering and inject malicious data into the MISP instance. This could undermine security controls and lead to intelligence data poisoning.
Recommendation
Update mispguard to a version that filters all 2xx status codes, not just 200. Verify trust in configured feeds and monitor for unusual response codes.
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-114425Critical
SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before 15.1.1 trusts a file path supplied in externally provided Large File Transfer attachment metadata. An unauthenticated remote sender can cause the mail-processing worker to disclose, move, or delete an accessible regular file when LFT is enabled and the message reaches an affected secure-mail processing path. The validated workers ran as root.
- CVE-2026-114424Critical
SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before 15.1.1 can evaluate attacker-influenced replacement text as Perl code in sender or recipient replacement rules. An unauthenticated remote sender can execute operating-system commands in the mail-processing worker context when an active rule uses message-derived replacement data and its search condition matches. The validated worker context was root.
- CVE-2026-121802Critical
@better-auth/expo before 1.7.16 signs a caller-supplied state value without verifying that it was issued by the server. This allows account-takeover outcomes, such as unauthenticated changes of any account's email address.
- CVE-2026-121615Critical
Linksys E5600 1.1.0.26 contains an improper authentication vulnerability in /cgi-bin/mesh_login.cgi (Login Handler). The attack can be launched remotely and the exploit has been publicly disclosed. The vendor did not respond and the product is no longer supported.
- CVE-2026-121609Critical
A vulnerability was identified in the Qihoo 360 Whole Home Router M5 version 4.0.17.1566 within the boot script /etc/init.d/mpt (Home function). The issue involves hard-coded credentials. The exploit is publicly available and remote exploitation is possible.
- CVE-2026-121607Critical
A vulnerability was found in Qihoo 360 D603-2, D600-2, D606-6 and D706 up to version 6.4.9 in the testspeed_command function of /fs2/bin/iscm. Manipulating the host argument results in OS command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely and the exploit has been made public.
- CVE-2026-121606Critical
A vulnerability was found in Qihoo 360 devices (models D621-2, D603-2, D600-2, D619, D606-6 and D706 up to 6.4.9) in the verify_sign function of fs2/bin/iscm responsible for firmware signature verification. Manipulating the sign argument leads to improper verification of cryptographic signatures. The attack can be launched remotely and the exploit has been publicly disclosed.
- CVE-2026-121600Critical
A vulnerability was found in TOTOLINK A950RG version 4.1.2cu.5268_B20221104 in the setMacFilterRules function of /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi handling MAC filtering. Manipulating the addEffect argument causes a stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be initiated remotely and the exploit is publicly available.
- CVE-2026-121599Critical
A vulnerability was detected in TOTOLINK A950RG version 4.1.2cu.5268_B20221104 in the setWiFiMultipleConfig/delWiFiMultipleConfig functions of /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi handling Multi-SSID configuration. Manipulating the wepkey2/wepkey3 arguments results in a stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely and the exploit is now public.
- CVE-2026-121598Critical
A security vulnerability was detected in TOTOLINK A950RG version 4.1.2cu.5268_B20221104 in the strcpy function of /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi handling basic wireless configuration. Manipulating the wepkey argument leads to a stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be initiated remotely and the exploit has been publicly disclosed.
Original NVD description (English source)
MISP mispguard is a security filtering proxy that inspects and blocks MISP feed responses based on configured rules. The process_feed_response method in src/mispguard.py was responsible for evaluating feed responses before they reached the MISP instance. The original logic only explicitly handled the case where the HTTP status code was not 200 by passing the response through without filtering, on the assumption that non-200 responses would not carry ingestible event data. However, HTTP 2xx status codes other than 200 (such as 201 Created, 203 Non-Authoritative Information, and 206 Partial Content) were also passed through unfiltered. Because MISP may still ingest content from these responses, a malicious or compromised feed host could return a 203 or 206 status code with arbitrary content, effectively bypassing all of mispguard's filtering rules. This allowed unfiltered or malicious feed data to be ingested into the MISP instance, undermining the security controls that mispguard is designed to enforce. The vulnerability requires the attacker to control or compromise a feed endpoint configured in the MISP instance. No authentication or user interaction is required beyond the feed polling mechanism already in place.
Vulnerability data from NVD (NIST) · CISA KEV · EPSS