CVE Catalog

CVE-2026-0861

HighCVSS 8.4
Published: Updated: Translated: NVD NIST

Summary

Passing too large an alignment to the memalign suite of functions (memalign, posix_memalign, aligned_alloc) in GNU C Library versions 2.30 to 2.42 may result in an integer overflow, which could consequently result in heap corruption. To exploit this, an attacker must control both the size and alignment arguments; the size must be close to PTRDIFF_MAX and the alignment in the range [1<<62+1, 1<<63] (exactly 1<<63 for posix_memalign and aligned_alloc). In practice, alignment is typically not attacker-controlled, making exploitation unlikely.

Risk Assessment

In typical applications alignment parameters are fixed, limiting exploitability. Risk increases in applications that incorrectly pass untrusted alignment values, potentially leading to memory corruption and possible code execution.

Recommendation

Upgrade glibc to a version containing the fix. Review application code for passing untrusted alignment values to memalign functions.

Other vulnerabilities in GNU C Library

See all
Original NVD description (English source)

Passing too large an alignment to the memalign suite of functions (memalign, posix_memalign, aligned_alloc) in the GNU C Library version 2.30 to 2.42 may result in an integer overflow, which could consequently result in a heap corruption. Note that the attacker must have control over both, the size as well as the alignment arguments of the memalign function to be able to exploit this. The size parameter must be close enough to PTRDIFF_MAX so as to overflow size_t along with the large alignment argument. This limits the malicious inputs for the alignment for memalign to the range [1<<62+ 1, 1<<63] and exactly 1<<63 for posix_memalign and aligned_alloc. Typically the alignment argument passed to such functions is a known constrained quantity (e.g. page size, block size, struct sizes) and is not attacker controlled, because of which this may not be easily exploitable in practice. An application bug could potentially result in the input alignment being too large, e.g. due to a different buffer overflow or integer overflow in the application or its dependent libraries, but that is again an uncommon usage pattern given typical sources of alignments.

Vulnerability data from NVD (NIST) · CISA KEV · EPSS